Cases 81 - 90 of 4,817
Dumond, Daniel v. Pena
as 1:2024cv20844
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dumond
Defendant:
R. Pena
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Pena v. F C I Pollock
as 1:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Francisco Andricks Pena
Defendant:
Warden F C I Pollock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pena v. Bringer Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv20793
Plaintiff:
Juan Pena
Defendant:
Bringer Corporation and Eduardo De Castro
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002 Fair Labor Standards Act
Pena v. Nevada Property 1, LLC
as 2:2024cv00408
Plaintiff:
Monica Pena
Defendant:
Nevada Property 1, LLC d/b/a The Cosmopolitan of Las Vegas and Nevada Property 1, LLC doing business as The Cosmopolitan of Las Vegas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Antar v. Torres Shlatz et al
as 3:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
Theodora F. Antar
Defendant:
Jessica C Torres Shlatz, State of Connecticut, William T. Cremins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edmond, Lucson v. Pena
as 1:2024cv20769
Plaintiff:
Lucson Edmond
Defendant:
Pena
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Pelosi-Dahl v. Rhoden et al
as 3:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Zachary V. Pelosi-Dahl
Defendant:
Scotty Rhoden, Julie C. Johnson, Brian S. Kramer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MacWilliams v. Uncapher
as 24-50129
Plaintiff:
Jessie MacWilliams
Defendant:
Sally Uncapher, Disrict Attorney's Office and Bianca Pena
Khali M. Bey v. Los Angeles County et al
as 2:2024cv01591
Plaintiff:
Khali M. Bey
Defendant:
Los Angeles County, Department of Children and Family Services, Jocelin Pena and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00375
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
