Cases 81 - 90 of 394
Ellen Gray v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company
as 17-15446
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELLEN GRAY, as personal representative of the ESTATE OF HENRY GRAY
Defendant - Appellee:
R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, individually and as successor by merger to the Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corporation and The American Tobacco Company,
Ellen Gray v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company
as 17-15210
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross Appellant:
ELLEN GRAY, as personal representative of the Estate OF HENRY GRAY
Defendant - Appellant-Cross Appellee:
R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, individually and as successor by merger to the Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corporation and The American Tobacco Company
:
SERVICE
MCCRACKEN v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY et al
as 2:2017cv04495
Plaintiff:
TED A. MCCRACKEN
Defendant:
R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, DEBRA CREW, ITG BRANDS LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Andrew Tarrow v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company et al
as 8:2017cv01568
Defendant:
DOES, Daniel Harrington, Staci Meyer and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Tarrow
USA v. Philip Morris USA Inc., et al
as 16-5127
Defendant / Appellee:
British American Tobacco, p.l.c., Directly and as Successor to B.A.T. INDUSTRIES P.L.C., Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, Directly and as successor by merger to AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY, American Tobacco Company, Directly and as Successor to the tobacco interest of AMERICAN BRANDS, INC. and others
Intervenor / Appellee:
GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare, L.P., Elan Corporation, PLC, Novartis Consumer Health, Inc. and others
Not Yet Classified:
American Heart Association, National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Philip Morris USA Inc., Formerly known as Philip Morris Incorporated, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Altria Group, Inc., Formerly Philip Morris Companies Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America, United States Department of Justice
Interested Party:
Commonwealth-Altadis, Inc., Commonwealth Brands Incorporated and ITG Brands, LLC
USA v. Philip Morris USA Inc., et al
as 16-5101
Defendant / Appellee:
British American Tobacco, p.l.c., directly and as successor to B.A.T. Industries p.l.c., Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, directly and as successor by merger to American Tobacco Company, American Tobacco Company, directly and as successor to the tobacco interest of American Brands, Inc. and others
Intervenor / Appellee:
GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare, L.P., Elan Corporation, PLC, Novartis Consumer Health, Inc. and others
Not Yet Classified:
American Heart Association, National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Americans For Nonsmokers' Rights and others
Defendant / Appellant:
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Philip Morris USA Inc., formerly known as Philip Morris Incorporated, Altria Group, Inc., formerly Philip Morris Companies Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America, United States Department of Justice
Interested Party:
Commonwealth-Altadis, Inc., Commonwealth Brands Incorporated and ITG Brands, LLC
WOODS v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY
as 1:2017cv00560
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY WOODS
Defendant:
R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Engel v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, et al.,
as 2:2017cv00618
Plaintiff:
Julius M. Engel
Defendant:
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company and Philip Morris USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hebert et al v. Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, Inc., et al
as 1:2016cv01394
Plaintiff:
Jacques-Rene Hebert , Sara Benson , Carol Murphy and others
Defendant:
Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company Inc, Reynolds American Inc. and R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
