Cases 81 - 90 of 319
United States v. Deon Bailey
as 21-3235
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Deon Anthony Romell Bailey
HARO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv52759
Plaintiff:
ROMEL HARO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
OWENS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv49510
Plaintiff:
ROMELL OWENS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cantrell v. Conely et al
as 5:2021cv00227
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Lynn Music Cantrell and Slim Shady
Defendant:
Johnathan Matthew Conely, Snoop Serious Pimp Records LTD, Jay Z and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv42124
Plaintiff:
AUNRIE ROMELL DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Productos Medicinales SRL v. MC Group Associate LLC et al
as 3:2021cv01386
Plaintiff:
Productos Medicinales SRL
Defendant:
MC Group Associate LLC, MANUEL CASIANO NEGRONI, ROMEL GUERRERO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker et al v. Walker et al
as 2:2021cv00904
Plaintiff:
Richard J Johnson and Samantha Romel Walker
Defendant:
Renee Walker and Christian Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romel v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston et al
as 1:2021cv10987
Defendant:
Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston and Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston
Plaintiff:
Kevin Romel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv17428
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMARI ROMELL KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Deon Bailey v. United States
as 21-1841
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Debtor:
Deon Anthony Romell Bailey
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
