Cases 81 - 90 of 730
Roundtree-McCrorey v. Amtrak et al
as 3:2022cv00491
Plaintiff:
Anjaknie Roundtree-McCrorey
Defendant:
Amtrak and MTA/CT Rail
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Roundtree-McCrorey v. Children & Families et al
as 3:2022cv00483
Plaintiff:
Anjaknie Roundtree-McCrorey
Defendant:
Department of Children & Families, Nichole Stewart, Gene P and others
Roundtree-McCrorey et al v. State Treasurer Office et al
as 3:2022cv00455
Plaintiff:
Anjaknie Roundtree-McCrorey, Andrew McCrorey, Jr and Mattie P McCrorey
Defendant:
State Treasurer Office, City Hall, State Capital and others
Roundtree v. Connecticut's Department of Transportation et al
as 3:2022cv00428
Plaintiff:
Anjaknie Roundtree
Defendant:
Connecticut's Department of Transportation and Grand Canyon University
Roundtree v. Jones et al
as 3:2022cv00427
Plaintiff:
Anjaknie Roundtree
Defendant:
Jeff Jones, Miriam Aviles, Duncan and others
Roundtree v. Hartford Courant et al
as 3:2022cv00414
Plaintiff:
Anjaknie Roundtree
Defendant:
Hartford Courant, Telemundonevainglaterra.com, Dailyadvent.com and others
Roundtree v. United States of America
as 9:2022cv80419
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Roundtree, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Gunter v. French et al
as 1:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Marquie Bartholomew Gunter
Defendant:
Daniel K. Franch, Natalie S. Paine and Richard Roundtree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roundtree v. Orange County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv01697
Plaintiff:
Rashaun M. Roundtree
Defendant:
Orange County Jail and Orange County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ussery v. Roundtree et al
as 1:2022cv00013
Plaintiff:
Roger Junior Ussery
Defendant:
Sheriff Ronald Roundtree, DA Jared Williams, Judge Wade Padgett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
