Cases 81 - 90 of 125
Brazier v. Beard et al
as 1:2013cv00787
Plaintiff:
Kevin Deon Brazier
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard, Kathleen Dickinson, K. Holland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Reed et al
as 1:2013cv00416
Plaintiff:
Curtis Daniels
Defendant:
S. Reed, P. Matzen, T. Haak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trujillo v. Stainer et al
as 1:2013cv00363
Plaintiff:
Samuel Trujillo
Defendant:
M. Stainer, K. Holland, M. Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jerman McGowan v. P. Covello et al
as 5:2013cv00165
Defendant:
T Busby, P Covello, F Duenas and others
Plaintiff:
Jerman McGowan
Morgan et al v. Metzger Law Group
as 5:2012cv01145
Defendant:
Mr. Raphael Metzger, Metzger Law Group and Ms. Kimberly Miller
Plaintiff:
S. Reed Morgan and Gregory G. Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Daedalus Capital LLC et al v. Vinecombe et al
as 8:2012cv02533
Plaintiff:
Daedalus Capital LLC and Lockwood Technology Corporation
Defendant:
Bradford Vinecombe , Bruno Reigl , Adam Vinecombe and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Reed v. United States of America
as 4:2012cv01896
Petitioner:
Antoine S. Reed
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rosa v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2012cv14294
Plaintiff:
Julio Rosa
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Collins, Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daedalus Capital LLC et al v. Vinecombe et al
as 1:2012mc91246
Plaintiff:
Daedalus Capital LLC and Lockwood Technology Corporation
Defendant:
Bradford Vinecombe , Bruno Riegl , Adam Vinecombe and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv05947
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
