Cases 81 - 90 of 754
Smith v. Lebough et al
as 1:2022cv00619
Plaintiff:
Dayomic Smith, Sr.
Defendant:
Larry Lebough, Lt. Charles Armstrong, Sheila Heard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Boone v. Western Tidewater Regional Jail Medical Dept. Staff
as 1:2022cv00616
Plaintiff:
Earl B. Boone, Sr.
Defendant:
Western Tidewater Regional Jail Medical Dept. Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
McCray v. Green et al
as 5:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Dr. Pastor Leon Keith McCray, Sr.
Defendant:
Victor A. Green, Christopher A. James and Wesley M. Dellinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edwards v. Roth
as 3:2022cv00375
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Edwards, Sr.
Defendant:
Carrie Roth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question-Violation of Due Process
Dillard v. Salmon et al
as 7:2022cv00254
Plaintiff:
Cleon Elroy Dillard, Sr.
Defendant:
Joshua Salmon and Officer Watts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beverly v. Schmitt et al
as 7:2022cv00241
Plaintiff:
Keelyn Sheron Beverly, Sr.
Defendant:
Major Schmitt and Blue Ridge Regional Jail-Amherst
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00340
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Logan v. Angolone et al
as 1:2022cv00459
Plaintiff:
Orell Logan
Defendant:
Ronald Angolone, Gary Bass, Harold W. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodson v. Woodson
as 7:2022cv00208
Plaintiff:
Mr. Roosevelt Harry Woodson, Jr.
Defendant:
Roosevelt Harry Woodson, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wade, et al v. Newport Group, Inc., et al
as 3:2022cv00179
Plaintiff:
Derrell Wade, Reuben J. Boyd, Rev. Derrell Wade and others
Defendant:
African Methodist Episcopal Church, James Davis, Samuel L Green and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
