Cases 81 - 90 of 1,281
Robertson v. Harrison et al
as 4:2022cv00619
Plaintiff:
Michael Otis Robertson
Defendant:
T Harrison, Joseph Austin, Eric S Higgins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Radford v. King et al
as 4:2022cv00591
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee Radford
Defendant:
Kiamera M King, Ballon, Quanica Bealer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Younger v. J&CT LLC
as 3:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
Daniel T Younger
Defendant:
J&CT LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Jones v. Kulesa et al
as 4:2022cv00545
Plaintiff:
Tamala T Jones
Defendant:
Logan K Kulesa, Shawn M Jones, Jacksonville, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Ellis v. Lay et al
as 2:2022cv00107
Plaintiff:
Jerry James Ellis
Defendant:
Gaylon Lay, Anthony Jackson, M Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Lay et al
as 4:2022cv00541
Plaintiff:
Jerry James Ellis
Defendant:
Gaylon Lay, Anthony Jackson, M Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dillard v. Tanner et al
as 2:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
John Wayne Dillard, III
Defendant:
Dawn Lee Tanner, Dexter Payne, G Lay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ousley v. Bo Jester Logging, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv04046
Plaintiff:
David Brian Ousley
Defendant:
Bo Jester Logging, LLC and Frank T. McDore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Martin v. Lay et al
as 2:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Lawrence E Martin
Defendant:
Gaylon Lay, K Randle, Sophia Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conley v. Hutchinson et al
as 4:2022cv00353
Plaintiff:
Gary Lynn Conley
Defendant:
Asa Hutchinson, Dextar Payne, Kenyon V Randle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
