Cases 81 - 90 of 170
Ring et al v. Battlefield High School et al
as 1:2016cv00001
Plaintiff:
Kaden Ring , Ralph Ring and Heather Ring
Defendant:
Battlefield High School and Prince William County Public Schools
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Roudabush, Jr. v. Theodore Nelson
as 15-7584
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
THEODORE C. NELSON, SA, U.S. Department of State, JASON CALLAHAN, Detective, Prince William County Police Department, STEPHAN HUDSON, Chief, Prince William Police Department and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-1989
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sturgill v. Williams County, ND et al
as 4:2015cv00112
Plaintiff:
Steven James Sturgill
Defendant:
Williams County, ND, Ken Stenberg and Misty Falcon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-1711
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Joseph Ruhren v. Marcos Spittal
as 15-6905
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH RUHREN
Defendant - Appellee:
MARCOS SPITTAL, Detective Prince William County Police, LUTHER, Sergeant Manassas A.D.C. and MELETIS, Superintendent Manassas A.D.C.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00552
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Fraser et al v. Brooks et al
as 4:2014cv00162
Plaintiff:
Jarrett Thomas Fraser and Richard Sergent
Defendant:
Steve Brooks, Joe Webb and Williams County, ND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
