Cases 81 - 90 of 149
Marie et al v. Witkowski
as 1:2016cv00282
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Marie and Michael Patrick
Defendant:
Bret Witkowski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dawan Thurmond v. City of Southfield, MI, et al
as 16-1223
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAWAN PIERCE THURMOND
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SOUTHFIELD, MI, CITY OF SOUTHFIELD ATTORNEY OFFICE, SUSAN P. WARD-WITKOWSKI and others
Owen Barnaby v. Bret Witkowski, et al
as 16-1207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OWEN W. BARNABY
Defendant - Appellee:
BRET WITKOWSKI, County Treasurer and COUNTY OF BERRIEN, named as Berrien County Government
McCain v. St. Clair, County of et al
as 2:2016cv10112
Defendant:
St. Clair, County of, PETER BIONDO, OLEJNIK and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene McCain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawan Thurmond v. City of Southfield, MI, et al
as 15-2235
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAWAN PIERCE THURMOND
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SOUTHFIELD, MI, CITY OF SOUTHFIELD ATTORNEY OFFICE, SUSAN P. WARD-WITKOWSKI and others
Dawan Thurmond v. City of Southfield, MI, et al
as 15-2177
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAWAN PIERCE THURMOND
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SOUTHFIELD, MI, CITY OF SOUTHFIELD ATTORNEY OFFICE, SUSAN P. WARD-WITKOWSKI and others
Thurmond v. Southfield, City of et al
as 2:2015cv13167
Plaintiff:
Dawan Pierce Thurmond [E-Filer]
Defendant:
Southfield, City of, Southfield City Attorney Office, Susan P. Ward-Witkowski and others
Jones v. Forbes et al
as 3:2015cv00613
Plaintiff:
Dashante Scott Jones
Defendant:
Scarlett Forbes, Mark Frayne, Waldron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Witkowski et al v. Bay Towers Company
as 1:2015cv00674
Defendant:
Bay Towers Company
Plaintiff:
Kelly Dempsey and Eric Witkowski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-9001
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
