Cases 81 - 90 of 16,213
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00711
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Cardell Houston v. Anthony Davis
as 24-3280
Petitioner:
CARDELL D. HOUSTON
Respondent:
ANTHONY DAVIS, Warden
Ismael Padilla v. U.S. District Court for Northern District of Texas
as 24-6458
Plaintiff:
ISMAEL PADILLA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, CITY OF ANGLETON, TEXAS, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PAROLES and others
Scarcelli v. Farmers Insurance Exchange et al
as 6:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Jamie Scarcelli
Defendant:
Farmers Insurance Exchange, Farmers New World Life Insurance Company and Brent Earl Mayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
REIMOLD v. SKREWBALL SPIRITS, LLC et al
as 0:2024cv60457
Plaintiff:
JOHN REIMOLD
Defendant:
SKREWBALL SPIRITS, LLC and INFINIUM SPIRITS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Salazar v. Spirit Airlines Inc et al
as 4:2024cv01040
Plaintiff:
Thelma Elizabeth Salazar
Defendant:
Spirit Airlines Inc and CITY OF HOUSTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Shomer v. Rheinscheld
as 2:2024cv01283
Plaintiff:
Zachary Houston Shomer
Defendant:
Amber Marie Rheinscheld and Lt. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rector v. Director, TDCJ ***CASE TRANSFERRED TO SDTX, HOUSTON DIVISION***
as 4:2024cv01741
Plaintiff:
Lonnie H Rector, Jr
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ewing v. Murphy et al
as 3:2024cv00578
Plaintiff:
Anton A. Ewing
Defendant:
John Anthony Murphy and Polaris Rental Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 FCC-Unsolicited Telephone Sales
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
