Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 81 - 90 of 134,349
Goings v. Neekson et al
as 1:2024cv01396
Plaintiff: Mark Cassidy Goings
Defendant: Neekson, Figuroa and Gavigin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Long v. Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services
as 1:2024cv01397
Plaintiff: Colonel Preston Long, III
Defendant: Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Saenz-Quintero v. FCI Bennetsville (WARDEN)
as 0:2024cv03009
Petitioner: Jose Saenz-Quintero
Respondent: FCI Bennetsville (WARDEN)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Robinson v. Greer Police Department
as 6:2024cv03011
Plaintiff: Joshua Lynn Robinson
Defendant: Greer Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Robinson v. Scott
as 6:2024cv03012
Plaintiff: Joshua Lynn Robinson and Joshua HayMaker
Defendant: Brittany D Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jennings v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00315
Plaintiff: Kenneth Jennings
Defendant: Chadwick Dotson, Mack A. Bailey, Jr., Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blystone v. Bayliss, Warden
as 5:2024cv00092
Petitioner: Charles Blystone
Respondent: Melissa Bayliss, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Damron v. Brown
as 3:2024cv00057
Petitioner: Christopher R. Damron
Respondent: Warden R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
US v. Arthur Jones
as 24-6462
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ARTHUR F. JONES, a/k/a Arthur Palmer, a/k/a June, a/k/a Junior
Akeem Mason v. J. Booth
as 24-6460
Plaintiff: AKEEM C. MASON
Defendant: J. BOOTH, Captain - GTL site supervisor, DEBORAH ALDERSON, CEO, Chairman of GTL and GLOBAL TEL LINK, inmate calling service

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?