Cases 81 - 90 of 700
RX Savings, LLC et al v. Besch et al
as 2:2019cv02439
Plaintiff:
Dan Henry, David Shewmaker, RX Savings, LLC and others
Counter Defendant:
Michael Rea
Defendant:
Besch Holdings, LLC, Laxman Degala, Douglas Besch and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Gardner v. Coleman American Moving Services, Inc.
as 2:2019cv02478
Plaintiff:
Aaron Gardner
Defendant:
Coleman American Moving Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Bicknell v. Financial Business and Consumer Solutions, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02417
Defendant:
Midland Funding LLC, FBCS, Inc., Midland Funding, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
lora bicknell
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Winters v. Central Bank of the Midwest et al
as 2:2019cv02422
Defendant:
Equifax Information Services, LLC, Trans Union, LLC, Experian Information Solutions Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Katherine M. Winters
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
T-Mobile Central LLC et al v. Wichita, City of et al
as 6:2019cv01162
Plaintiff:
T-Mobile Central LLC and APC Towers III, LLC
Defendant:
Wichita, City of and Wichita City Council
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0332
Jones v. JTM Capital Management, LLC
as 5:2019cv04051
Defendant:
JTM Capital Management, LLC
Plaintiff:
Logan Jones
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Fortune v. Midland Funding LLC
as 2:2019cv02153
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Fortune
Defendant:
Midland Funding LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Braucher v. Trans Union, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv02264
Defendant:
Experian Information Solutions Inc., Equifax Information Services LLC, Trans Union LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SUSAN BRAUCHER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Hernandez v. Doordash, Inc.
as 2:2019cv02158
Plaintiff:
Mia Hernandez
Defendant:
Doordash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Hernandez v. Doordash, Inc.
as 2:2019cv02159
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Hernandez
Defendant:
Doordash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
