Cases 1 - 10 of 218
Brewer v. White et al
as 5:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
Felicia Brewer
Defendant:
FNU White, Grace Trahan, Ron Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ponce v. Brooksby et al
as 2:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
Lazaro Ponce
Defendant:
Nate Brooksby and FNU Johnson
Interested Party:
Correction Section (FYI) and Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stokes v. Neal et al
as 5:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Cory Lee Stokes
Defendant:
Jeffrey Neal and Correctional Officer FNU Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Foothills Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Albert Anderson
Defendant:
Foothills Correctional Institution, FNU Hudgins, FNU Motley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chambers v. Ishee et al
as 5:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Patrick J. Chambers
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Kimberly D. Grande, Larry Williamson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Johnson et al
as 6:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
FNU Johnson, FNU Tulf, FNU Ranjo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Anderson v. Johnson et al
as 6:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Samuel Anderson
Defendant:
FNU Johnson, FNU Tulf, FNU Ranjo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pendelton v. Johnson et al
as 6:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Pendelton
Defendant:
FNU Johnson, FNU Tulf, FNU Ranjo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tovar v. Johnson et al
as 6:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Joseph Tovar
Defendant:
FNU Johnson, FNU Tulf, FNU Ranjo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Tovar v. Johnson et al
as 4:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Joseph Tovar
Defendant:
FNU Johnson, FNU Tulf, FNU Ranjo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
