Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Davis v. Easter et al
as 5:2015cv03012
Plaintiff:
Kevin Tamar Davis
Defendant:
Jeff Easter, (fnu) Willits, (fnu) Milam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cameron v. Caldwell et al
as 3:2014cv00181
Plaintiff:
Shannon Cameron
Defendant:
FNU Caldwell, FNU Roger, FNU Edward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willey et al v. Law Firm of Jeremy Rogers et al
as 2:2013mc01004
Plaintiff:
Roy Willey and Candi Willey
Defendant:
Law Firm of Jeremy Rogers, Jeremy M. Rogers, FNU Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Miller v. Chaves County Detention Center et al
as 2:2013cv00793
Plaintiff:
Jessie Lon Miller
Defendant:
Chaves County Detention Center, FNU Rogers, FNU Elmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer v. Parsons et al
as 3:2013cv00339
Plaintiff:
Antaun K. Spencer
Defendant:
Jesse Williams, K. Allred, FNU Young and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Chaves County Detention Center et al
as 1:2013cv00271
Plaintiff:
Alvin Thomas
Defendant:
Chaves County Detention Center, Ralphiel Baraza, Susan Casley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kinnell (ID 31576) v. Crow et al
as 5:2011cv03207
Plaintiff:
Rolly O. Kinnell
Defendant:
Sam A. Crow, (fnu) Rogers, 10th Circuit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Gzlles et al
as 1:2011cv00132
Plaintiff:
Riccardo Darnell Jones
Defendant:
FNU Gilles, FNU Buckner, FNU Wright and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Gatlyn v. Rogers et al
as 2:2011cv00079
Plaintiff:
Peter Gatlyn
Defendant:
FNU Rogers, FNU Pena and George Fuchs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kinnell v. U.S. District Court Judges, et al
as 10-3259
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROLLY O. KINNELL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CLERKS, STATE COURTS OF KANSAS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
