Cases 1 - 10 of 229,540
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21952
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Dunlop et al v. Cramer et al
as 1:2024cv02211
Plaintiff:
Daniel D. Dunlop and Andrew Garcia
Defendant:
Jeffery M. Cramer, Mary Polly Frederick and Home Real Estate, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Trujillo v. Wilkens et al
as 1:2024cv00501
Plaintiff:
Fabian Trujillo
Defendant:
FNU Wilkens, Jacob D. and Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashley MaxwellIn re: Ashley Maxwell
as 24-50390
Petitioner:
In re: Ashley Maxwell, Zach Maxwell, Mistie Sharp and others
Respondent:
Fund Texas Choice, North Texas Equal Access Fund, Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity and others
Smith v. Knowlton
as 24-3208
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE CHRISTOPHER SMITH
Defendant:
D. KNOWLTON, California Correctional Institution at Tehachapi
James Esseks, et alIn re: James Esseks, et al
as 24-11618
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES D. ESSEKS, CARL CHARLES, LATISHA FAULKS and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
W. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv03048
Plaintiff:
D. W.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Raiser-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Yanyou Chen et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 5:2024cv01076
Plaintiff:
Yanyou Chen, Jielu Liu and Yihong Liu
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Los Angeles Asylum Office and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
