Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Shaun Stewart v. State of Florida, et al
as 26-12359
Plaintiff:
SHAUN PATRICK STEWART
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, DAVID J. FORSYTHE, E. PELTA and others
Chang v. Saunders, et al.
as 26-4301
Plaintiff:
VICKI CHANG, and minor J. C.
Defendant:
CHARLES SAUNDERS, MIHAELA SAUNDERS, KIM CORNELL and others
SAUNDERS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2026cv08128
Plaintiff:
REGINA SAUNDERS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Carrasco v. Pierce County District Court, et al.
as 26-4221
Plaintiff:
DONAVEN MARKUS CARRASCO
Defendant:
PIERCE COUNTY DISTRICT COURT, RYAN SAUNDERS, Pierce County Assigned Counsel, KELLY BARRETT, Pierce County Assigned Counsel and others
SAUNDERS v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2026cv04461
Plaintiff:
BRANDI SAUNDERS
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC and PHARMACIA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Arnold v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2026cv01294
Plaintiff:
Neil Dwayne Arnold, III
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, BHS Manager Veep, S. Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Livingston v. Saunders
as 1:2026cv02494
Plaintiff:
Bradley Livingston
Defendant:
James Saunders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
BLUE v. CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY et al
as 1:2026cv01249
Plaintiff:
DUANE BLUE
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY and ANDREW SAUNDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Rights - Denial of Due Process
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03951
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
