Cases 41 - 50 of 391
Alonzo et al v. Federal Correctional Institute Pollock Medium, et al
as 1:2022cv01588
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alonzo, Jaun Frausto, Bairo Cardona Perez and others
Defendant:
Warden Federal Correctional Institute Pollock Medium and Federal Correctional Institution Pollock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Leon Alcantar v. Garland
as 22-947
Petitioner:
CONSUELO LEON ALCANTAR, STEPHANY ARREDONDO LEON, FATIMA ARREDONDO LEON and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Primerica Life Insurance Company v. Ramirez et al
as 2:2022cv00888
Defendant:
Alma Alcantar, Claudia Odette Ramirez, Emerita Ramirez and others
Plaintiff:
Primerica Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
ALCANTAR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv04650
Plaintiff:
RUDOLPH ALCANTAR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-20139
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Joshua Dalke v. Clark King, et al
as 22-15392
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUA DALKE
Defendant / Appellee:
CLARK KING, MADSEN, P. CARDONA and others
Alcantar v. Ingram et al
as 2:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
Arturo Alcantar
Defendant:
Michael Ingram, Felicia Voldahl, Dustin Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alcantar-Garcia v. Garland
as 22-24
Petitioner:
ROSA ELENA ALCANTAR-GARCIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Alcantar
as 21-51182
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jesus Alcantar, also known as Jesus Manuel Alcantar
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv03719
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
