Cases 1 - 10 of 290
ARNOLD v. USBOP
as 1:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS D. ARNOLD
Defendant:
USBOP STAFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
Roberts v. Arnold et al
as 1:2024cv00959
Plaintiff:
Brandon Roberts
Defendant:
Keith K. Arnold and North Branch Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024hc02062
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
ARNOLD v. USA
as 1:2024cv00056
Petitioner:
TRAVIS DENORRIS ARNOLD
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Arnold McCartney v. Donnie Ames
as 23-7197
Petitioner / Appellant:
ARNOLD WAYNE MCCARTNEY
Respondent / Appellee:
DONNIE AMES, Superintendent, Mount Olive Correctional Complex and Jail
Nolan Floyd, Sr. v. Shane Weber
as 23-7143
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NOLAN KINARD FLOYD, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN SHANE WEBER, CHIEF OF SECURITY KEITH ARNOLD, LT. JAMES SMITH and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023hc02248
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
Vickery et al v. McBride et al
as 8:2023cv05647
Plaintiff:
Russell Vickery, Matthew Richey, Charles Williams and others
Defendant:
Sheriff Chad McBride, Captain David Baker, Admin. Lt. Nathan Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Shiheed v. Houghes et al
as 1:2023cv01862
Plaintiff:
Yahyi Shiheed
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Tina Houghes and Warden Keith Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Murphy et al
as 2:2023cv03211
Plaintiff:
Fred Freeman
Defendant:
Judge Matie Murphy, Kelly B. Arnold, Deborah S. McKeown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
