Cases 71 - 80 of 124
Noble v. Delay et al
as 2:2014cv02164
Plaintiff:
Leonard Noble
Defendant:
Gunner Delay and Daniel Shue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Noble v. Delay et al
as 4:2014cv00449
Plaintiff:
Leonard Noble
Defendant:
Gunner Delay and Daniel Shue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Knowles (Rakeem Wilson)
as 14-2243
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Steven Knowles, AKA Manny Fresh, Michael Andrews, Glen Basket, AKA Big Mugs and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Rakeem Wilson
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-3424
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
United States of America v. Knowles (Pegues)
as 14-558
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Steven Knowles, AKA Manny Fresh, Michael Andrews, Glen Basket, AKA Big Mugs and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Donald Pegues, AKA Vegas
United States of America v. Knowles (Glivens)
as 14-128
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Steven Knowles, AKA Manny Fresh, Michael Andrews, Glen Basket, AKA Big Mugs and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Christopher Glivens, AKA Young Gunners
Gunner v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2014cv00021
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Development Center Americas Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Standford Gunner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Knowles (Glivens)
as 13-4858
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Steven Knowles, AKA Manny Fresh, Michael Andrews, Glen Basket, AKA Big Mugs and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Christopher Glivens, AKA Young Gunners
Joshua Johnson v. Marion Feather
as 13-35857
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSHUA GUNNER JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
MARION FEATHER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
