Cases 1 - 10 of 1,985
Hughes v. Guidroz et al
as 6:2024cv00648
Plaintiff:
Harold Hughes, Jr
Defendant:
Bobby Guidroz, Jessie Bellard, J Pickens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roach v. Harold
as 3:2024cv00359
Plaintiff:
Donaven D. Roach
Defendant:
Unknown Harold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramirez Escobar v. Walmart Stores Texas, LLC
as 4:2024cv01652
Plaintiff:
Mauro Harold Ramirez Escobar
Defendant:
Walmart Stores Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Keller et al v. Newsom
as 3:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Harold Keller and Deborah Keller
Defendant:
John Newsom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Miller v. Chevron USA
as 24-30204
Plaintiff:
Sandra Miller, on behalf of Harold Miller
Defendant:
Chevron USA, Incorporated, Marathon Oil Company and Devon Energy Production Company, L.P.
Roshell v. Washington et al
as 3:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Daryl G. Roshell
Defendant:
Alice Washington, Unknown Roe, Unknown Harold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cadence Bank et al v. Precedent Wealth Partners, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Cadence Bank and Linscomb Wealth
Defendant:
Precedent Wealth Partners, LLC, Joseph Harold Williams and George Williams
Shepard v. U.S. Marshal Service and Task Force
as 2:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Harold Shepard
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal Service and Task Force
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
