Cases 31 - 40 of 406
Timothy Jackson v. Connie Mitchell, et al
as 23-1487
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Timothy Wade Jackson
Defendant / Appellee:
Connie Mitchell, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, James Ross, Probation Officer, James Heath, Probation/Parole Officer and others
Hotard v. Martin
as 2:2023cv00881
Plaintiff:
Francis Hotard
Defendant:
Heath Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cecil v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv50073
Plaintiff:
Jacob Cecil
Defendant:
C/O Hannah Smith, Nickels, Lt. Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Adams et al
as 4:2023cv04006
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wade Jackson
Defendant:
Captain Golden Adams, Jail Administrator Alice Miller, Connie Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hotard v. Martin
as 3:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
Francis Hotard
Defendant:
Heath Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jung-Peters v. Bagley et al
as 7:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Marc Arron Jung-Peters
Defendant:
Ben Bagley, Akacia Teague, Vera Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Edwards et al
as 2:2022cv05342
Plaintiff:
Raymond Knight
Defendant:
Daniel Edwards, Heath Martin, Robert Goings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Veech et al
as 4:2022cv00539
Plaintiff:
Steven Ray Thompson
Defendant:
Frank Veech, Sgt. JoJo Thornton and Heath Winfrey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Mitchell et al
as 4:2022cv04117
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wade Jackson
Defendant:
Connie Mitchell, James Ross, James Heath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath v. Sterling et al
as 8:2022cv04148
Plaintiff:
Decorian L Heath
Defendant:
Brian Sterling, Charles Williams, John Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
