Cases 91 - 100 of 218
Whitt v. Wyatt et al (INMATE 1)(LEAD CASE)
as 1:2021cv00671
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Defendant:
James Wyatt and James Brazier
Consolidated Defendant:
Spencer Downs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ryles v. Taylor et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2021cv00589
Plaintiff:
Sanford Leonard Ryles
Defendant:
Heath Taylor, Mike Loyless, Steve Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petty v. Taylor et al (INMATE 1)(MEMBER)
as 3:2021cv00552
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Petty
Defendant:
Heath Taylor, Wayne Johnson, Sergeant Hood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aaron et al v. Hudson et al
as 6:2021cv01058
Plaintiff:
Amanda Aaron and Heath Aaron
Defendant:
Blake Carter Hudson and Nick Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petty v. Taylor et al (INMATE 1)(MEMBER)
as 3:2021cv00511
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Petty
Defendant:
Russell County Jail, Heath Taylor, Wayne Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitt v. Brazier et al (INMATE 1)(MEMBER)
as 1:2021cv00228
Defendant:
Commander Moore, James Brazier and Kelita Moore
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitt v. Moore et al (INMATE 1)(LEAD)
as 1:2021cv00175
Defendant:
Commander Moore, Officer Roberts, Sgt. Morris and others
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Consolidated Defendant:
James Brazier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitt v. Morris (INMATE 2)
as 1:2021cv00176
Defendant:
Commander Moore, Officer Roberts and Sgt. Morris
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heath et al v. White Glove Delivery of Georgia Inc et al
as 7:2021cv00310
Plaintiff:
Larry Heath and Julius Russell, Jr
Defendant:
White Glove Delivery of Georgia Inc and Phillip Oties Pack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOKF, N.A. v. Bama Oaks Retirement, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00029
Defendant:
Bama Oaks Retirement, LLC, Medical Clinic Board of the City of Mobile (second) and Saint Simons Heath Care, LLC
Plaintiff:
BOKF, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
