Cases 41 - 50 of 298
Hamilton v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 3:2022cv00982
Plaintiff:
Heath Hamilton
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Calvin v. Stark County et al
as 5:2022cv00768
Plaintiff:
Reverend Justin Calvin
Defendant:
Stark County, Kevin L. Sedares, Joe Pillegi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shottenkirk v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01706
Plaintiff:
Heath Shottenkirk
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Heath v. Baldauf et al
as 2:2022cv01186
Plaintiff:
Shawnelle Heath and Shawntelle Heath
Defendant:
Warden Teri Baldauf and LT.. Kramer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lorenzo HeathIn re: Lorenzo Heath
as 22-1224
Petitioner:
In re: LORENZO LAMAR HEATH
Respondent:
MICHELLE FLOYD, Warden
Levy Machining, LLC et al v. Hanover et al
as 2:2021cv12566
Plaintiff:
Levy Machining, LLC, Ryan Levy, Robert Levy and others
Defendant:
Township of, Hanover and Jeff Heath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Maiya McCoy, et al v. OH, et al
as 21-3964
Plaintiff:
MAIYA MCCOY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF OHIO, OHIO STATE HIGHWAY PATROL, DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION and others
Defendant:
ELYRIA, OH POLICE DEPARTMENT
Miller v. Baltimore Builders Supply & Millwork, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04867
Plaintiff:
Devon Miller
Defendant:
Baltimore Builders Supply & Millwork, Inc., Hometown Hardwares, Inc., Ashville Ace Hardware and others
Blevens et al v. Kentucky State Police Department et al
as 3:2021cv00571
Plaintiff:
David Gene Blevens and McKinzie Marshall
Defendant:
Kentucky State Police Department, Commonwealth of Kentucky, Sergeant Dallas Greer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
