Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
HEATH v. BUTLER COUNTY PRISON
as 2:2023cv01998
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS T. HEATH
Defendant:
BUTLER COUNTY PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
CONLEY et al v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2021cv01486
Plaintiff:
DANIEL F. CONLEY, ANGELA SCUNZIANO, PAUL ROHAN and others
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V, PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC and PHILIPS R.S. NORTH AMERICA, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HARVEST v. BERNSTEIN et al
as 3:2020cv00013
Plaintiff:
WINSLOW ULYSSES HARVEST
Defendant:
JUDGE TAMMARA BERNSTEIN and HEATH LONG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01257
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAY v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2018cv01414
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, ROBERT GILMORE and STEPHEN DURCO
Plaintiff:
HEATH W. GRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
EVANS v. MUNICIPALITY OF MONROEVILLE et al
as 2:2017cv00187
Plaintiff:
HEATH EVANS
Defendant:
MUNICIPALITY OF MONROEVILLE, BOROUGH OF PITCAIRN, MONROEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AMTRUST CORPORATE MEMBER LIMITED v. NEFF STREET PARTNER, LP et al
as 1:2016cv00257
Plaintiff:
AMTRUST CORPORATE MEMBER LIMITED
Defendant:
NEFF STREET PARTNER, LP, NEFF STREET RESIDENCES, A CONDOMINIUM, INC., GREGORY C. MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00961
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
