Cases 1 - 10 of 113
McCray v. Wolfe et al
as 1:2024cv02698
Plaintiff:
Donald McCray
Defendant:
Catherine Wolfe and Kiyo Matsumoto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matsumoto v. Li Tai Po Cocktail Lounge
as 4:2024cv00778
Plaintiff:
Marc Matsumoto
Defendant:
Li Tai Po Cocktail Lounge
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Matsumoto v. Butterfield Gourmet, LLC
as 3:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Shoichi Matsumoto
Defendant:
Butterfield Gourmet LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Matsumoto, et al. v. Labrador
as 23-3787
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LOURDES MATSUMOTO, NORTHWEST ABORTION ACCESS FUND and INDIGENOUS IDAHO ALLIANCE
Defendant / Appellant:
RAUL LABRADOR, in his capacity as the Attorney General for the State of Idaho
MATSUMOTO v. PHO REAL LLC
as 1:2023cv02059
Plaintiff:
SHOICHI MATSUMOTO
Defendant:
PHO REAL LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
MATSUMOTO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv32577
Plaintiff:
LANCE MATSUMOTO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kurtanidze v. Mizuho Bank, Ltd. et al
as 1:2023cv08716
Plaintiff:
David Kurtanidze
Defendant:
Mizuho Bank, Ltd., Kenichi Matsumoto, Kinoshita Satoshi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Equal Rights Under the Law
In re Ex Parte Application of Jun Matsumoto
as 5:2023mc80230
Not Classified By Court:
Jun Matsumoto
Interested Party:
Google LLC
MATSUMOTO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv21369
Plaintiff:
BRYANT MATSUMOTO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Matsumoto, et al. v. Labrador
as 1:2023cv00323
Plaintiff:
Lourdes Matsumoto, Northwest Abortion Access Fund and Indigenous Idaho Alliance
Defendant:
Raul Labrador
Amicus Curiae:
Proposed Amici State of Washington et al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
