Cases 1 - 10 of 1,028
Maurice Owen v. United States
as 24-1887
Plaintiff:
Maurice Antonio Owen, also known as Maurice Antonio Parham
Defendant:
United States of America
Lovlie v. United States et al
as 0:2024cv01502
Plaintiff:
Jan H. Lovlie
Defendant:
United States, United States of America, United States Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Whittaker v. Owens et al
as 4:2024cv00565
Plaintiff:
Robert Whittaker
Defendant:
Dr. Shannon K. Owens, Dale Glass, Unknown Frazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00313
Plaintiff:
Delman Owens
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Owens v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01223
Plaintiff:
Susan Owens
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Koontz v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Morris B Koontz
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William Straughn, Moses Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 6:2024cv06029
Plaintiff:
Letia Owens
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Lester v. Norwood et al
as 1:2024cv01018
Plaintiff:
Michael Fred Allen Lester
Defendant:
Sheriff David Norwood, Jail Administrator Cameron Owens, Shift Supervisor Amanda Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owen v. Reyes et al
as 4:2024cv04042
Petitioner:
Lance George Owen
Respondent:
Warden Reyes and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tavron v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Marques Tavron
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Mose Jackson, III, M Richarson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
