Cases 1 - 10 of 162
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rodrigues v. The Providence Center, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Antonia Rodrigues
Defendant:
The Providence Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Rodriguez Then v. US
as 24-1120
Petitioner:
LUIS MANUEL RODRIGUE THEN and LUIS MANUEL RODRIGUEZ THEN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES
Noel v. Romelus, et al
as 23-2058
Plaintiff:
ARNOLD A. NOEL, on behalf of himself and A.G.N. and B.M.N.
Defendant:
BARTHINE ROMELUS, PAUL M. CRONAN, BRAILEY E. NEWTON and others
De Oliveira Rodrigues, et al v. Garland
as 23-2081
Petitioner:
JOZELIA MARIA DE OLIVEIRA RODRIGUES and E.C.D.O.R.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Rodrigues v. Rodrigues
as 23-2012
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTONIO RODRIGUES
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL RODRIGUES, Superintendent, MCI Shirley Medium
Celester v. Rodrigues
as 23-1973
Petitioner / Appellant:
JERMAINE CELESTER
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL RODRIGUES and MICHAEL RODRIGUES, Superintendent of MCI Shirley
Rodrigues et al v. City of Brockton et al
as 1:2023cv12724
Plaintiff:
Djason Rodrigues, Danielson Rodrigues and Jason Mosley
Defendant:
City of Brockton, City of Brockton Police Department, Mayor Robert F. Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Amica Mutual Insurance Company as subrogee of Arlindo Rodrigues v. Amazon.com Services LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00449
Plaintiff:
Amica Mutual Insurance Company as subrogee of Arlindo Rodrigues
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC and Genuine Products Supply LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
