Cases 1 - 10 of 88
Santos v. South Carolina, The State of
as 6:2024cv01712
Plaintiff:
Eliseo Santos
Defendant:
South Carolina, The State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Santos v. Bodiford
as 5:2024cv01244
Petitioner:
Eliseo Santos
Respondent:
Scotty Bodiford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00468
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Santos v. Bodiford et al
as 5:2024cv00756
Plaintiff:
Eliseo Santos
Defendant:
Scotty Bodiford, Ronald Hollister and Greenville County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Santos v. Unknown Respondent
as 5:2024hc02019
Petitioner:
Andreuris Santos
Respondent:
Unknown Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
LeAnthony Winston v. Megan Montoya
as 23-7185
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEANTHONY T. WINSTON
Defendant / Appellee:
MEGAN MONTOYA, ROBERT BROADBENT, LINDSEY SANTOS and others
Daniel Taylor v. Unit Manager Santos
as 23-7166
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL TAYLOR
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIT MANAGER SANTOS, SERGEANT COOKE and ASSISTANT WARDEN RUSSELL
Aaron Stephen v. Gerald Baker
as 23-7162
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AARON LANCE STEPHEN
Defendant / Appellee:
GERALD BAKER, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SANTOS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ISSAC and others
Trujillo v. Scarantino et al
as 5:2023hc02235
Petitioner:
Uriel Santos Trujillo
Respondent:
Warden T. Scarantino, Federal Bureau of Prisons and U.S. Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Uzzle v. Boyd et al
as 7:2023cv00670
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Uzzle
Defendant:
Randy Boyd, Vicky Williams, Jeffery Artrip and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
