Cases 1 - 10 of 607
Johnson v. Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02043
Plaintiff:
Stephen Johnson
Defendant:
Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Pedraza v. Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02016
Plaintiff:
David Pedraza
Defendant:
Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Scott v. Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02018
Plaintiff:
Christian D. Scott
Defendant:
Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Acevedo v. Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01987
Plaintiff:
Juan Acevedo
Defendant:
Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Aviles v. Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01997
Plaintiff:
Omar Aviles
Defendant:
Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Miller v. Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01901
Plaintiff:
Evan Miller
Defendant:
Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gordon v. Weems et al
as 3:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Gordon
Defendant:
Ronnie Weems, J. Manning, Sexton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dalton v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Jeremy James Dalton
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Fentress County, Shane Sexton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas Morton v. Audi of America, LLC, et al
as 24-10427
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS GRANT MORTON
Defendant:
AUDI OF AMERICA, LLC, VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC., d.b.a. Audi of America, Inc., AUDI AG and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
