Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 21 - 30 of 104
LEWIS v. CITY OF EVANSVILLE et al
as 3:2019cv00250
Plaintiff: ANDRE G. LEWIS
Defendant: CITY OF EVANSVILLE, DAVID KIELY, IAN BLAIR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARMSTRONG v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv04475
Plaintiff: ROGER BLAIR ARMSTRONG
Defendant: COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK INCORPORATED and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03753
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
HARLOW et al v. STILES MACHINERY, INC.
as 3:2019cv00142
Plaintiff: BLAIR HARLOW and JEFF HARLOW
Defendant: STILES MACHINERY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SYSTEMS PLANT SERVICES, INC. v. HARRINGTON et al
as 1:2019cv02544
Defendant: DAVID HARRINGTON and BLAIR MECHANICAL, LLC
Plaintiff: SYSTEMS PLANT SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCARLAVAI et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv02019
Plaintiff: MARY BLAIR and RICHARD SCARLAVAI
Defendant: COOK MEDICAL INC, WILLIAM COOK APS, COOK INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NORINGTON v. ZOLEY et al
as 1:2019cv01185
Defendant: KRUL, GEORGE C. ZOLEY, M. LOGAN and others
Plaintiff: LAKESHA NORINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00824
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
ABDUL-GHAFOOR, et al v. PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATOIN, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00024
Plaintiff: RHODA KATHLEEN BLAIR, LINDA COHILL, GUY E. DONA and others
Defendant: RONALD D. ROMAIN and PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BLAIR
as 4:2018cv00220
Defendant: JERRY LEE BLAIR
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?