Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv05286
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
McLeod v. Stevens Transport Inc
as 3:2026cv03112
Plaintiff:
Casey McLeod
Defendant:
Stevens Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Delomba v. Casey's Marketing Company
as 5:2026cv06178
Plaintiff:
Dianna Delomba
Defendant:
Casey's Marketing Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv05294
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sack v. Summit County et al
as 1:2026cv04291
Plaintiff:
Guy R. Sack
Defendant:
Summit County, Colorado, Town of Frisco, Colorado, Summit Fire & EMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fleetpride, Inc. v. McClaskey et al
as 3:2026cv03104
Plaintiff:
Fleetpride, Inc.
Defendant:
Harland McClaskey, Casey McClaskey, Patrick Hudelson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Mallory v. City of Charles City et al
as 2:2026cv01030
Plaintiff:
Casey Mallory
Defendant:
City of Charles City, Hugh Anderson and Tyler Trout
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02552
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Valentine v. Mahal Transport et al
as 6:2026cv03543
Plaintiff:
Casey Valentine
Defendant:
Mahal Transport and Parveen Kumar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv02214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
