Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Cornell v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 5:2024cv05061
Plaintiff:
Timothy Allen Cornell
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Williams v. Pulaski, County of et al
as 4:2023cv01169
Plaintiff:
Khakeem Marquis Williams
Defendant:
Pulaski, County of, Eric Higgins, Mark Swaggerty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Jones v. Dickerson et al
as 2:2023cv00071
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Cornell Jones
Defendant:
Marni Dickerson, Shantel Northenton and Crittenden County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Arkansas Department of Correction
as 4:2020cv00923
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Correction
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Cornell Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Thomas et al
as 4:2019cv04018
Plaintiff:
Samantha Edwards
Defendant:
Eric James Cornell Thomas and McElroy Truck Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Devine v. Walker et al
as 4:2018cv04156
Defendant:
Sergeant Allen Sanders, Miller County Jail, Officer Hennesey and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Devine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merritt v. Holladay et al
as 4:2018cv00545
Defendant:
Doc Holladay, Briggs, Brawley and others
Plaintiff:
Cornell Merritt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cornelous v. Beasley
as 2:2017cv00139
Plaintiff:
Kenyatta Cornelous
Defendant:
Gene Beasley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cornell v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 3:2017cv03041
Plaintiff:
Donna C. Cornell
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Cornell-Earls v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2016cv02066
Plaintiff:
Tamara K. Cornell-Earls
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
