Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Rios v. Meyer et al
as 5:2023cv00302
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
Brent Meyer, Wanda Mason, Derek Hester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rios v. Mason et al
as 5:2023cv00270
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
Wanda Mason, Derek Hester, Rebecca McKibben and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Morgan
as 23-10941
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Allen Lee Bell
Defendant / Appellee:
Sheriff Terry L. Morgan, Garza County Sheriff's Office, Philip Mack Furlow, Garza County District Attorney and Arthur Aguilar, Jr., Attorney at Law
Gibson v. Sauseda et al
as 5:2023cv00041
Petitioner:
Jordan Paul Gibson
Respondent:
Johnny Sauseda, Philip Mack Furlow, Judge Reed A. Filley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Griffin v. Furlow
as 5:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
Jewel Griffin
Defendant:
Cory Furlow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilmington Savings Fund Society v. Matthews et al
as 4:2022cv03809
Plaintiff:
Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, as Trustee of Stanwich Mortgage Loan Trust F and Wilmington Savings Fund Society
Defendant:
Clifton Matthews, Kimberly Matthews, Cynthia Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Bell v. Morgan, et al
as 5:2022cv00135
Plaintiff:
Allen Lee Bell
Defendant:
Garza County, Sheriff Terry L Morgan, Philip Mack Furlow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Furlow v. USA
as 3:2022cv00158
Petitioner:
Tammy Cole Furlow
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Ogeda v. Furlow et al
as 5:2021cv00164
Plaintiff:
Isaac Ogeda
Defendant:
Philip Mack Furlow and Reed A Filley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis v. Furlow et al
as 5:2021cv00161
Plaintiff:
Richard Curtis
Defendant:
Philip Mack Furlow and Reed A Filley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
