Cases 1 - 10 of 21
STEPHENS v. MCMANN et al
as 1:2023cv01314
Plaintiff:
JAMES STEPHENS
Defendant:
OFFICER MCMANN, CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS, SGT. ETHRIDGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCUTERI v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SCUTERI
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DUSHAN ZATECKY, RENDANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALTON v. UPROVA CREDIT LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00520
Plaintiff:
AARON WALTON
Defendant:
UPROVA CREDIT LLC, UPROVA HOLDINGS LLC, UPPER LAKE PROCESSING SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
SCUTERI v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SCUTERI
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DUSHAN ZATECKY, RENDANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EL v. MARION SUPERIOR COURT 10 et al
as 1:2023cv00436
Plaintiff:
CHEYOU EL
Defendant:
MARION SUPERIOR COURT 10, REGINA TIDWELL, MARIA MACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bowes-Northern v. Patel et al
as 2:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
Shedrick Bowes-Northern
Defendant:
Herman Patel, Porter County of, Porter City of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
BOWES-NORTHERN v. PATEL et al
as 1:2021cv03023
Plaintiff:
SHEDRICK BOWES-NORTHERN
Defendant:
HERMAN PATEL, COUNTY OF PORTER, CITY OF PORTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRIGSBY v. HAMMER
as 2:2021cv00378
Plaintiff:
DONNY LELAND GRIGSBY, JR.
Defendant:
J. HAMMER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 3:2021cv00448
Defendant:
Pearson, E Lowe, Croft and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMMER v. SAUL
as 4:2020cv00201
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
BRANDON K. HAMMER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
