Cases 1 - 10 of 1,239
Mitchell et al v. Phillips et al
as 5:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Cindy Mitchell, Whitney Thatcher, Vanessa Vasquez and others
Defendant:
Officer Jason Phillips and Sgt. Sullenger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grundstein
as 2:2024cv00618
Plaintiff:
Robert Harlan Grundstein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Harlan v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00553
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lavone Harlan
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya and New Mexico Probation and Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santos Perez et al v. Hildebrand Amusement Rides, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv14138
Plaintiff:
Juan Pedro Santos Perez, Byron Eduardo Ordon Hernandez, Odaliz Esther Gomez Lopez and others
Defendant:
Hildebrand Amusement Rides, Inc. and Harlan Bast
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
CHRISTOPHE v. DOE
as 3:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
ILMART CHRISTOPHE
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, TWITTY, GALLAWAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Kelly
as 24-1825
Defendant:
HARLAN LEROY KELLY, JR. and Harlan Kelly
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Alexander et al v. Sutton et al
as 1:2024cv02224
Plaintiff:
Deborah Alexander, Maud Maron and Noah Harlan
Defendant:
Tajh Sutton, Marissa Manzanares, David C. Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hopper v. Chancey et al
as 2:2024cv02040
Plaintiff:
Danny Hopper
Defendant:
Deputy Brandon Chancey, Former Prosecutor Rinda Baker, Prosecutor Kevin Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARLAN v. LLT MANAGEMENT LLC et al
as 3:2024cv02547
Defendant:
LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, LTL MANAGEMENT LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC and others
Plaintiff:
MINDY HARLAN
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
