Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Matthew Smith v. Dale Scrogum, et al
as 15-2134
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW J. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
DALE SCROGUM, Lieutenant, Pontiac Correctional Center, GREG KOCHEL, Correctional Officer, Pontiac Correctional Center and JODY DAVIS, Correctional Officer, Pontiac Correctional Center
Lazerrick Coffee v. Edward Lewis, et al
as 15-1936
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAZERRICK COFFEE
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWARD D. LEWIS, GREG KOCHELL, GREGORY TANGMAN and others
Dace v. Skeens et al
as 1:2015cv01138
Plaintiff:
Clarence Dace
Defendant:
Kristina Skeens, Salvador Godinez, David Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorn v. Pfister et al
as 1:2015cv01056
Plaintiff:
James Dorn
Defendant:
Randy S. Pfister, T. Scott Keen, Darryl Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharp v. Pfister et al
as 1:2015cv01024
Plaintiff:
Charles Sharp
Defendant:
Randy Pfister, Guy Pierce, Sr, Annabelle Mottelor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kochel v. South Lebanon Township et al
as 1:2014cv01721
Plaintiff:
Barry T. Kochel
Defendant:
South Lebanon Township and Sean McCarrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kochel v. Wilson et al
as 3:2013cv00440
Plaintiff:
Christina Kochel and A W
Defendant:
Pioneer Regional School Corporation , A S, Angel Scripter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Pete Kochel v. Harold Clarke
as 13-6409
Petitioner - Appellant:
PETE ALLEN KOCHEL
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Riley v. Prentice et al
as 1:2012cv01499
Plaintiff:
Danny Riley
Defendant:
Susan K Prentice, Dale E Scrogum, Jeremy J Olson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coffee v. Lewis et al
as 1:2012cv01416
Plaintiff:
Lazerrick Coffee
Defendant:
Edward D Lewis, Greg Kochell, . Tangman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
