Cases 11 - 20 of 232
Richardson El v. Scarborough et al
as 2:2023cv03198
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Richardson El
Defendant:
Mikell Scarborough d/b/a Charleston County/County of Charleston Master in Equity, Kristin Graziano d/b/a Charleston County/ County of Charleston Sheriff, John Kay d/b/a Hutchens Law Firm and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Nascot Enterprises, LLC v. F45 Training Incorporated et al
as 2:2023cv11524
Plaintiff:
NASCOT ENTERPRISES, LLC and Nascot Enterprises. LLC
Defendant:
F45 Training Incorporated and Marc Marano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Ralston v. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00348
Plaintiff:
Andy L. Ralston
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Barry Marano, Kyle Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diamond Funding Investors, LLC v. Marano
as 5:2023cv11115
Plaintiff:
Diamond Funding Investors, LLC
Defendant:
Michael Marano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ralston v. Clarke et al
as 1:2023cv00390
Plaintiff:
Andy L. Ralston
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Barry Marano and Kyle Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Cordell Sanders v. Andrea Moss, et al
as 23-1335
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CORDELL SANDERS
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREA MOSS, MICHAEL MELVIN, DAIDRA MARANO and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Lawrence Marano v. That Hashtag Show LLC
as 2:2023cv00270
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Marano
Defendant:
That Hashtag Show LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Marano v. Dormakaba USA, Inc.
as 6:2022cv02227
Plaintiff:
Matthew Marano
Defendant:
Dormakaba USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Don Collins v. Rob Jeffreys, et al
as 22-2679
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DON COLLINS
Defendant / Appellee:
ROB JEFFREYS, ANDREA S. TACK, DAIDRA MARANO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
