Cases 1 - 10 of 347
Barr v. Martin et al
as 4:2024cv01481
Plaintiff:
Vincent Lawrence Barr and Vincent Barr
Defendant:
Magistrate Judge Easler Martin, Lt. Oliver Nesmith, Solicitor Ella Alston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Oliver v. Edmound et al
as 7:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Dan Oliver
Defendant:
Warden Edmound, Unit Manager Mr. Wooden, Lt. Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03550
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03304
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Arnold McCartney v. Donnie Ames
as 23-7197
Petitioner / Appellant:
ARNOLD WAYNE MCCARTNEY
Respondent / Appellee:
DONNIE AMES, Superintendent, Mount Olive Correctional Complex and Jail
Don Galloway v. Donnie Ames
as 23-7046
Petitioner / Appellant:
DON GARFIELD GALLOWAY
Respondent / Appellee:
DONNIE AMES, Superintendent, Mount Olive Correctional Complex and R. S. MUTTER, Superintendent
Oliver v. Greer et al
as 5:2023ct03244
Plaintiff:
Keith Bayseam Oliver
Defendant:
Detective Marley Greer and Captain Karen Riggsbee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nicholas Robey v. Donald Ames
as 23-6790
Petitioner / Appellant:
NICHOLAS ROBEY
Respondent / Appellee:
DONALD F. AMES, Superintendent, Mount Olive Correctional Complex
Brandon Saul v. Donnie Ames
as 23-6769
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRANDON S. SAUL
Respondent / Appellee:
DONNIE AMES, Superintendent, Mt. Olive Complex
Kennan v. Brown et al
as 9:2023cv02313
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Kennan
Defendant:
Sgt. Montgomery, Kenneth Sharp, William Brightharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
