Cases 1 - 10 of 536
Mahmoud v. Holz et al
as 2:2024cv00806
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Abdalla Mahmoud
Defendant:
Holz, Bartlette, Brendal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Johnson v. David Gomez, et al
as 24-1634
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOHNSON
Defendant:
DAVID GOMEZ, Warden of Stateville, WENDY OLSEN, WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. and others
Olsen #119876 v. Arizona, State of
as 2:2024cv00883
Plaintiff:
Troy Timothy Olsen
Defendant:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hogan, Philip v. Olsen, Wayne et al
as 3:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Philip C. Hogan
Defendant:
Wayne Olsen, Mr. J. Aubihl, C.O. Matthew Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burch v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2024cv05286
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Burch
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Byrer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirschbaum v. Daily et al
as 9:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
George Kirschbaum
Defendant:
Sgt. Daily, SORC D.J. Decker, Sgt. Olsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nealy #209732 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
Charles E Nealy, Jr.
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Julie Bowers, J Barreras and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardrick v. Olsen et al
as 2:2024cv10484
Plaintiff:
Bernard Hardrick
Defendant:
A. Olsen, Cathy M Garrett, Shantel Word and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardrick v. Olsen et al
as 5:2024cv00853
Plaintiff:
Bernard A. Hardrick
Defendant:
A. Olsen, Cathy M. Garrett, Shantel Word and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sellers, Kendrick v. Schultz et al
as 3:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Dane Sellers
Defendant:
Schultz, David, Olsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
