Cases 1 - 10 of 68
POWERS v. WEBB et al
as 2:2023cv04679
Plaintiff:
RACHEL GENEVIEVE POWERS
Defendant:
JEREMIAH DARNELL WEBB, NOAH SENCER ROBERT BARCLAY, MALAKAI LEVI LYNCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KAUFFMAN v. SMITH et al
as 3:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
DAVID R. KAUFFMAN
Defendant:
BARRY SMITH, ERIC YOUNG, BORDAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Slack v. Office of Attorney General et al
as 3:2022cv01501
Plaintiff:
Joseph John Slack
Defendant:
Office of Attorney General, Robert McHugh, Erik L. Olsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00846
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
WATERMAN v. CYRUSONE INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Defendant:
CYRUSONE INC., LYNN A WENTWORTH, ALEX SHUMATE and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
LEWIN v. HUSSAR et al
as 2:2021cv00511
Plaintiff:
MARY LEWIN
Defendant:
BENJAMIN OLSEN, JEFFREY HUSSAR and DARION FEIST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATERMAN v. RIGNET, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01160
Defendant:
KEITH OLSEN, ROYAL ACQUISITION SUB, INC., STEVEN E PICKETT and others
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
JOHNSON v. AXTELL et al
as 2:2021cv00226
Defendant:
THOMAS AXTELL, JOHN DOE I (FICTITIOUS NAME), JOHN DOE II (FICTITIOUS NAME) and others
Plaintiff:
MARY JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UNITED STATES et al v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2019cv00836
Defendant:
CAROTHERS CONSTRUCTION, INC. and LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
OLSEN WOODWORK CO. and UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
KOON v. HIGH LINE HELICOPTERS, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00106
Defendant:
HIGH LINE HELICOPTERS, LLC and CHASE OLSEN
Plaintiff:
AMBER KOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
