Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jose Perez v. Joseph Biden, Jr., et al
as 23-3681
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jose A. Perez
Defendant / Appellee:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, Merrick B. Garland, US Attorney General and United States Department of Justice
Perez v. Biden et al
as 1:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Jose A Perez
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Merrick B. Garland and US Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jones v. Stofferahn et al
as 0:2023cv02386
Plaintiff:
Austin Jeffrey Jones
Defendant:
Anthony C Stofferahn, Robert J Conway, Margaret Astrup and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hayes v. Marshall Police Department
as 4:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
Fred Hayes
Defendant:
Marshall Police Department, Nicolas Perez, Michael Bohannon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Soto v. Strayhorn et al
as 2:2022cv00240
Plaintiff:
Francisco Soto
Defendant:
Cole Strayhorn, Letron Tate, Juan Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Gladstone Police Department et al
as 4:2022cv00429
Plaintiff:
Maceo Williams and Maceo Williams, I
Defendant:
Gladstone Police Department, Corporal John Doe, Officer Jesus Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sauermilch Perez v. Hilton Double Tree
as 4:2022cv03050
Plaintiff:
Tanya Sauermilch Perez
Defendant:
Hilton Double Tree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sauermilch Perez v. Koph
as 4:2022cv03077
Plaintiff:
Tanya Sauermilch Perez
Defendant:
Richard Koph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sauermilch Perez v. Chatholic Health Intuitive
as 4:2022cv03051
Plaintiff:
Tanya Sauermilch Perez
Defendant:
Chatholic Health Intuitive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
