Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Rhear et al v. Does
as 2:2024cv02442
Plaintiff:
Tonya Hughes, Tabatha Moffatt, Sandra Sanders and others
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Komatsu America Corp. et al
as 2:2024cv02419
Defendant:
Komatsu America Corp. and Amber Pugh
Plaintiff:
Darrin Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Peterson v. Wright et al
as 3:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
DeAndrey Peterson
Defendant:
Steven Wright, Hannah Evans, J Pugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pugh et al v. Lady Jane's Haircuts for Men Holding Company, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00556
Plaintiff:
Aubray Pugh, Olivia Lees and Cassidy Elliott
Defendant:
Lady Jane's Haircuts for Men Holding Company, LLC, Lady Jane's Murfreesboro TN, LLC and Lady Jane's Nashville-Cool Springs TN, LLC, Michigan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Pugh v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
Cynthia J. Pugh
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Tucker v. Perry et al
as 1:2021cv00073
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Tucker
Defendant:
Warden Grady Perry, Leigh Staggs, Emily Pugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sweatt v. Hininger et al
as 1:2021cv00062
Plaintiff:
Antonio L. Sweatt
Defendant:
Damon Hininger, Warden Grady Perry, f/n/u Patton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00322
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Memphis Police Department et al
as 2:2019cv02568
Defendant:
Sandra Last Name Unknown Adoptor, Jorden, Mattew Beleu and others
Plaintiff:
Georgette Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pugh v. United States of America
as 1:2018cv01134
Petitioner:
Hubert Edward Pugh
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
