Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Padma Rao v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
as 24-1347
Plaintiff:
PADMA RAO
Defendant:
J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and KIEFER KRAUSE
Rodriguez-Soto et al v. Rego et al
as 1:2024cv10284
Plaintiff:
Noralba Rodriguez-Soto and Urbano Patino
Defendant:
Aiden Rego, Katherine Burger, Timsi Rao and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Rao et al v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 1:2023cv08903
Plaintiff:
Kusama P Rao and Panduranda Rao
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Howard Adelsberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
RAO v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11672
Plaintiff:
LUIS RAO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CAMMELOT v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS et al
as 1:2021cv02997
Plaintiff:
CRAIG S CAMMELOT
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, DENNIS MCDONOUGH, RICHARD L. ROUDEBUSH V.A. MEDICAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Parthasarathi et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2021cv01940
Plaintiff:
Raghunath Parthasarathi and Sindhu A Rao
Defendant:
United States of America, Arizona, State of and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
v. ALVAR et al
as 1:2021cv00113
Defendant:
SUSHMA ALVAR, ECHO ALVAR, SUNDER PICHAI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ALVAR et al v. PICHAI et al
as 4:2021cv00277
Plaintiff:
SUSHMA ALVAR, ECHO ALVAR and SHANTHA RAJ
Defendant:
SUNDER PICHAI, GOOGLE, SMITHAMURTHY.COM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rao v. Thuo et al
as 1:2021cv10461
Defendant:
Peter T Bethoney, Lucy N Thiongo, Nicollette A Lynch and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Rao
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Rao v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2021cv01361
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE and CO., JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and KIEFER KRAUSE
Plaintiff:
DR. PADMA RAO and Padma Rao
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
