Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Robinson v. State of Iowa
as 4:2026cv00361
Petitioner:
Sherrell Quintrard Robinson
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morris v. Boost Mobile et al
as 2:2026cv02725
Plaintiff:
Breanna Sherrell Morris
Defendant:
Boost Mobile, Boost Subscriber Co. L.L.C., Dish Wireless L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Morris v. The United States of America et al
as 2:2026cv02738
Plaintiff:
Breanna Sherrell Morris and B.T.M.
Defendant:
The United States of America, The United States Department of Homeland Security and The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Morris v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 2:2026cv02736
Plaintiff:
Breanna Sherrell Morris
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv04044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Gordon v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv06671
Plaintiff:
Sherrell Gordon
Defendant:
Loreal USA, Inc., LOREAL USA Products, Inc. and SoftSheen-Carson, LLC
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
US v. Chrystalin Sherrell
as 26-4220
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CHRYSTALIN KNIKA SHERRELL
Greene v. BMW of North America LLC et al
as 7:2026cv01556
Plaintiff:
Sherrel Greene
Defendant:
BMW of North America LLC and Malik Rafaat Nagah Goda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sherrell Towns v. Jeffrey Wehking
as 26-1613
Petitioner:
SHERRELL C. TOWNS
Respondent:
JEFFREY WEHKING, Warden
Sherrell Towns v. Jeffrey Wehking
as 26-1546
Petitioner:
SHERRELL C. TOWNS
Respondent:
JEFFREY WEHKING, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
