Cases 1 - 10 of 67
Larch v. Prosecuting Attorney et al
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Tanner Moren Eagle Larch
Defendant:
Prosecuting Attorney and United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Mays v. Jennifer Saad
as 23-7127
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH RANDOLPH MAYS
Defendant / Appellee:
JENNIFER SAAD, RICHARD HUDGINS, MS. R. THOMPSON and others
JENNINGS v. KROEGER
as 1:2023cv00771
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND RONALD JENNINGS
Defendant:
TANNER L. KROEGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
US v. Tanner Larch
as 23-6451
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TANNER MOREN EAGLE LARCH
Redd v. Byrd et al
as 9:2023cv01605
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Daquan Redd
Defendant:
Investigator Robert Byrd, Investigator Todd Duncan, P.J. Tanner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hedrick v. Marshell (sic) et al
as 3:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Tanner Ray Hedrick
Defendant:
William K. Marshell (sic), III, Shelby Searls, L.T.C. Stove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larch v. USA
as 1:2023cv00049
Petitioner:
Tanner Moren Eagle Larch
Respondent:
USA
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Kessler v. Lewis et al
as 5:2022cv00551
Plaintiff:
William Joseph Kessler, III
Defendant:
Cornelius Russell Lewis, Gold Quality Foods, Cpl. N. J. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hedrick v. John/Jane Does et al
as 5:2022cv00260
Plaintiff:
Tanner Ray Hedrick
Defendant:
John/Jane Does, Kyle Wolf, Betsy Jividen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2022cv00467
Plaintiff:
Cody Graham
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Johnny Wilson, CO II David Ewing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
