Cases 1 - 10 of 3,860
Yang v. H F Z Capital Group LLC
as 1:2024cv03342
Plaintiff:
Stephen Yang
Defendant:
H F Z Capital Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Yang v. Earl G. Graves, Ltd.
as 1:2024cv03304
Plaintiff:
Stephen Yang
Defendant:
Earl G. Graves, Ltd. doing business as Black Enterprise
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Michael N. Brown v. Azusa Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv03569
Plaintiff:
Michael N. Brown
Defendant:
Azusa Police Department, Los Angeles County Fire Battalion 16, City of Hope - West Covina Hematology and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yang v. Dailycart LLC
as 2:2024cv03229
Plaintiff:
Haowei Yang
Defendant:
Dailycart LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Yang v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 1:2024cv00666
Plaintiff:
Zinan Yang
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Associate irector Connie Nolan and Ur M Jaddou
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00450
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Feng v. Kelai Corp.
as 24-979
Plaintiff:
SHANGGANG FENG, on his own behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated
Defendant:
KELAI CORP., d/b/a Jef Chinese, FAN YANG, JAY HUANG and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
