Cases 31 - 40 of 19,683
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Lin v. Wray
as 24-10420
Plaintiff:
Ke-Wei Lin
Defendant:
Christopher Wray, United States Department of Justice, (CA), Chad Yarbrough and others
Clarence Jackson v. State of Illinois, et al
as 24-1824
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE B. JACKSON
Defendant:
STATE OF ILLINOIS and ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
Doe #1 MLC et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (MKC) and John Doe #2 (JAS)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cobble et al v. Biden et al
as 1:2024cv02044
Plaintiff:
David Cobble and American Citizens
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Brad Raffensperger, Alexander Soros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bouazza Ouaziz v. Phil Murphy, et al
as 24-1867
Plaintiff:
BOUAZZA OUAZIZ
Defendant:
PHIL MURPHY, Governor of New Jersey - Individually and Personal Capacity, SARAH ADILMAN, Chief Executive of Department of Human Service, FRANK MEZZA, Deputy Director Department of Family Service Hudson County - Individually and Personal Capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60783
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
