Cases 91 - 100 of 112
United States of America v. $45,000.00 in United States Currency
as 8:2011cv00014
Defendant:
$45,000.00 in United States Currency
Claimant:
Carlos Martins
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Martin v. Swanson et al
as 8:2010cv00372
Defendant:
Acherson and Swanson
Plaintiff:
LeAnna Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martinez et al v. City of Fremont et al
as 4:2010cv03140
Plaintiff:
ACLU Nebraska Foundation, Steven Dahl, Jane Doe and others
Defendant:
City of Fremont, Timothy Mullen and Dean F. Skokan, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Brown v. Providence Medical Center et al
as 8:2010cv00230
Plaintiff:
Jeff Brown
Defendant:
Benjamin Martin, M.D., Mercy Medical Clinics and Providence Medical Center
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Martin v. Astrue
as 4:2010cv03116
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Johnny W Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Chase Bank USA, N.A. v. Martin
as 8:2009mc00065
Plaintiff:
Chase Bank USA, N.A.
Defendant:
Mickey Martin
American Express Centurion Bank v. Martin
as 8:2009mc00060
Plaintiff:
American Express Centurion Bank
Defendant:
Michael Dennis Martin
Rodriguez Cisneros v. USA
as 4:2009cv03099
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Oscar Martin Rodriguez Cisneros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bethel v. Martin et al
as 4:2009cv03058
Plaintiff:
James Bethel
Defendant:
Eric Martin, Mary A. Steinbeck, Colin G. Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Walker v. Walker, et al
as 4:1993cv00358
Receiver:
Boyd Strope
Counter Defendant:
Harry R. Walker, II
Plaintiff:
Harry R. Walker, II
Counter Claimant:
Harry R. Walker and Walker Land & Cattle Co.
Defendant:
Harry R. Walker and Walker Land & Cattle Co.
402) 392-1011 (fax:
Dennis E. Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
