Cases 1 - 10 of 1,302
Harper v. Magistrate and Circuit Courts of Cabell County et al
as 3:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Holly R. Harper
Defendant:
Magistrate and Circuit Courts of Cabell County, Dan Ferguson, J. E. Hood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Ames et al
as 2:2023cv00784
Plaintiff:
Prince A. Price
Defendant:
Donald F. Ames, William K. Marshals and W.V. Divisions Correction Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neely v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00752
Petitioner:
Lisa F. Neely
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cox v. Ames
as 2:2023cv00577
Petitioner:
Christopher Cox
Respondent:
Donald F. Ames
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Horton v. Ames
as 3:2023cv00184
Petitioner:
Adonne Horton
Respondent:
Donald F. Ames
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ware v. F.P.C. Alderson
as 1:2023cv00470
Petitioner:
Olivia Ware
Respondent:
F. P. C. ALDERSON and F.P.C. Alderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
James v. Abraham et al
as 5:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Myron Sylveste James
Defendant:
Lt. W/F Abraham, Doctor PA Wood, Doctor PA Burishman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
McCoy v. Kanawha County Board of Education et al
as 2:2023cv00314
Plaintiff:
Chelena J. McCoy
Defendant:
Kanawha County Board of Education and Dr. Thomas F. Williams, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hillberry v. Straughn
as 5:2023cv00125
Petitioner:
Roy F. Hillberry, II
Respondent:
Shawn Straughn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hi-Lad, Inc. v. Colombo et al
as 2:2023cv00228
Plaintiff:
Hi-Lad, Inc.
Defendant:
James E. Colombo, Robert F. Tebay, David Blaire (sic) Couch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
