Cases 1 - 10 of 99
Bradbury et al v. Scott et al
as 2:2023cv02355
Plaintiff:
William F. Bradbury, Jr., Danny E. Starner, Christopher Ford and others
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODRC), JPay/Securus Technologies, Viapath Technologies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flores #81654 v. Huss et al
as 2:2022cv00186
Plaintiff:
Eliot Flores #81654 and Eliot Flores #811654
Defendant:
Erica Huss, Brenda Jones, Unknown Christy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aaron Young v. Dean Mulvaine, et al
as 22-3733
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AARON E. YOUNG
Defendant / Appellee:
DEAN MULVAINE, Correctional Counselor at NCCC, BENJAMIN BLANKENSHIP, Correctional counselor at NCC, in Marion C&D Unit, RUBEN QUINTERO, Major at NCCC and others
Flores v. Unknown Defendant
as 3:2022cv00367
Plaintiff:
Ramon F. Flores
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant and Lamine N'Diaye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FLORES-LOPEZ v. LOWE
as 3:2021cv00840
Petitioner:
MIGUEL ANGEL FLORES-LOPEZ
Respondent:
WARDEN CRAIG A. LOWE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Oquendo v. USA
as 2:2020cv04523
Petitioner:
Jonathan Flores Oquendo
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Reed v. Plancic et al
as 3:2020cv00577
Defendant:
Cindy Cossey, Ryan Caulfield, Ember Eyster and others
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores v. Turner
as 3:2019cv02608
Respondent:
Warden Neil Turner
Petitioner:
Miguel A. Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Young v. Mulvaine et al
as 3:2018cv02807
Defendant:
Neil Turner, Sergeant A. Flores, Lorri Shuler and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron E Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores-Lopez v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 3:2018cv00330
Respondent:
Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Petitioner:
Eleazar Florez-Lopez and Eleazar Flores-Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
